New Cases For the Week of April 26, 2010 - April 30, 2010

Brought to you by BKINFORMATION.COM - The Source for Business Bankruptcy Information on the Internet 

Click here to search prior New Opinion summaries.

 

April 30, 2010

Case

Court

Holding

In re Dreier LLP
(DBN)
Bankr. SD NY

A constructive trust is a creature of equity. However, the equities of bankruptcy are not the equities of the common law. Particularly in the case of Ponzi schemes, constructive trust claims in bankruptcy are disfavored.

The bankruptcy court lacks jurisdiction to permanently enjoin non-derivative third party claims agianst a party settling with the debtor.

In re TSIC, Inc.
(DBN)
Bankr. DE

A director and officer of a debtor was a party to an employment agreement, with severance benefits, executed longer than two years before the petition date. The director/officer was dismissed by the board within two years of the petition date. In connection with the dismissal, the director/officer entered into a settlement agreement resolving all claims against the debtor (including claims arising under the employment agreement). Payments of approximately $6 million were made within two years of the petition date.

Because the settlement agreement was executed within two years of the petiiton date, transfers made pursuant thereto were within the two-year look-back period of 11 USC 548. The "insider status" of the transferee (i.e., the former officer/director) is determined at the time of the settlement agreement, rather than at the time of the transfer (when the transferee was no longer a statutroy insider).

 

     
April 29, 2010

Case

Court

Holding

In re: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.et. al. v. Liberty Energy, LLC, et al.
(DBN)
Bankr. ED OK Where a court is simultaneously confronted with a motion to transfer venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1412 of an action removed from state court, and a motion to remand or otherwise abstain from hearing the case, the prevailing view is that the action should be transferred to the bankruptcy court where the underlying bankruptcy is pending, and that court should determine whether to remand or abstain from hearing the action.
     

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © 2010  [BKINFORMATION.COM]. All rights reserved.