New Cases For the Week of September 29, 2003 - October 3, 2003

Brought to you by BKINFORMATION.COM - The Source for Business Bankruptcy Information on the Internet 

October 3, 2003

Case

Court

Holding

In re 310 Associates
(DBN Subscription Required)
2d Cir. Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1) authorizes a district court to relieve a party from the effects of a judgment based on the court's own mistake of fact.  The court's mistake about the existence of multiple already-engaged buyers justified modification of a prior order authorizing a break-up fee.

October 2, 2003

Case

Court

Holding

In re Mirant Corp.
(DBN Subscription Required)
Bankr. N.D. Tex. Bankruptcy court can enjoin federal government agency from taking action otherwise permitted by exception to automatic stay.

October 1, 2003

Case

Court

Holding

In re Great Northern Papaer, Inc.
(DBN Subscription Required)
D. ME A Chapter 7 trustee is not entitled to substitute himself in as the postconversion appellant in an appeal filed by the official unsecured creditors committee.

September 30, 2003

Case

Court

Holding

In re UAL Corp.
(DBN Subscription Required)
Bankr. Ill. An election under 11 USC 1110 to continue performing an aircraft lease creates an administrative liability for cure payments and for future payments due under the lease. The obligation arises regardless of whether the debtor effects a cure after making the election (i.e. failure to cure does not void a 1110 election). 

The court vacates the debtor's 1110 election however, based upon the debtor's excusable neglect in assuming that no cure was due on account of the subject aircraft.

In re Incomnet, Inc.
(DBN Subscription Required)
9th Cir. BAP The bankruptcy court erred in finding that a recipient of funds from the debtor during the preference period was not a "transferee" under the "conduit" theory.  The recipient, a highly-regulated entity, received the funds in its own bank account.
In re Kelley
(DBN Subscription Required)
9th Cir. BAP Although a debtor's declared homestead remained effective after he moved away from the property, in the context of bankruptcy the exemption was of no aid to the debtor, since a declared homestead in which a debtor does not live is not protected from forced sale.

September 29, 2003

Case

Court

Holding

In re Cambridge Industries Holdings, Inc.
(DBN Subscription Required)
Bankr. DE 11 USC 502(d) prevents prosecution of a preference action against a creditor whose claim has been objected to and allowed.
In re Lopez
(DBN Subscription Required)
9th Cir. McClellan Fed. Credit Union v. Parker (In re Parker), 139 F.3d 668 (9th Cir. 1998), which allows a consumer debtor to file a statement of intention  and keep collateral without reaffirming, remains good law. 
Copyright © 2003  [BKINFORMATION.COM]. All rights reserved.