New Cases For the Week of December 22, 2003 -
December 26, 2003
Brought to you by BKINFORMATION.COM
- The Source for Business Bankruptcy Information on the Internet
December
24, 2003
|
Case
|
Court
|
Holding
|
In
re McGee
(DBN Subscription Required) |
7th
Cir. |
Federal
law preempts any effort by
state and local governments to
determine which assets may be
reached, for what purposes, by
particular creditors. A State
law that requires landlords to
hold tenants' deposits in a
segregated account for the
benefit of the tenants creates
a fiduciary relationship for
the purposes of 11 USC
523(a)(4) nondischargeability.
A landlord who takes and
spends such money during lease
litigation
"defalcates,"
rendering the debt to the
tenant nondischargeable. |
In
re Grogan
(DBN Subscription Required) |
Bankr.
UT. |
A
debtor is not entitled to a
claim of exemption on an asset
which she knowingly concealed
and failed to disclose and
then later disclosed and
claimed as exempt. |
In
re Gray
(DBN Subscription Required) |
Bankr.
W.D. Mo. |
Horses
and heifers are tools of
trade. |
|
|
|
December
22, 2003
|
Case
|
Court
|
Holding
|
In
re Aquatic Development Group,
Inc.
(DBN Subscription Required) |
2nd
Cir. |
The
bankruptcy court abused its
discretion in closing a
bankruptcy case nunc pro tunc
to 1996 to avoid the payment
of United States Trustee fees. |
In
re Brookover
(DBN Subscription Required) |
6th
Cir. |
The
authority to accept the
voluntary resignation of a
bankruptcy trustee is vested
entirely within the purview of
the UST's congressionally
conferred authority. The
Court has no role is accepting
or denying the voluntary
resignation of a trustee. |
In
re Moroney
(DBN Subscription Required) |
4th
Cir. |
Income
tax forms unjustifiably filed
years late, where the IRS has
already prepared substitute
returns and assessed taxes, do
not constitute
"returns" for
purposes of 11 U.S.C. §
523(a)(1)(B)(i). |
In
re Fredrika
(DBN Subscription Required) |
9th
Cir. BAP |
In
evaluating the market rate of
interest for confirmation of a
plan, the bankruptcy court did
not err in using the
"formula approach"
rather than the
"comparable loan"
approach. However the court
did err in its implementation
of the formula approach when
it excessive weight to the
first lien nature of the
collateral and it gave
insufficient weight to the
risk of the debtor's
default. |
In
re Krag
(DBN Subscription Required) |
9th
Cir. BAP |
A
plan that provides that all
holders of allowed unsecured
claims except for one will
receive prompt payment of
their claims in cash violates
11 USC 1123(a)(4).
The
bankruptcy court has equitable
authority to order the holder
of a nondischargeable debt to
seek payment only under a 100%
plan so long as the debtor is
not in default.
In
cases involving corporate
debtors, a new value
contribution will presumably
always have some use, whether
it be for operating capital,
financing for capital
improvements or purchases, or
to establish and maintain cash
reserves, for example. But, in
the case of an individual
Chapter 11 debtor who works
for wages or a salary, a new
value contribution in excess
of that necessary to fund
payments under the plan serves
no reorganization purpose
absent some identifiable use,
other than to arguably
manipulate the new value
analysis. |
In
re Dwyer
(DBN Subscription Required) |
9th
Cir. BAP |
In
California, the day after
Thanksgiving is a legal
holiday for purposes of
calculating time in bankruptcy
matters. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|