New Cases For the Week of July 22, 2002 - July 26, 2002

Brought to you by BKINFORMATION.COM - The Source for Business Bankruptcy Information on the Internet 

July 26, 2002

Case

Court

Holding

Sponaugle v. First Union Mortgage Corp.
(DBN Subscription Required)
3rd Cir. A creditor's attorney's fees incurred post-confirmation in connection with relief from a postconfirmation ddefault are not subject to 506(b).
In re Kresler
(DBN Subscription Required)
3rd Cir. Although a secured creditor's claim was disallowed for being filed one day late, the creditor's lien survived the disallowance as an in rem claim, and the creditor had standing to object to the debtor's plan, which attempted to characterize the disallowed claim as a secured claim with a value of "zero."
In re Perry Hollow Management Co., Inc.
(DBN Subscription Required)
1st Cir. The bankruptcy court did not err in finding that a secured creditor's security interest was unperfected becuase it was filed in the wrong town (for debtors which only do business in one town, State law requires filing with the Secretary of State and in the town where the debtor operates).

July 24, 2002

Case

Court

Holding

In re Gandy
(DBN Subscription Required)
5th Cir. Although debtor's adversary proceeding claims contained many of the facts at issue in pending prepetition State court litigation, and some of the claims were not core claims, the majority of the claims were core claims arising under the Bankruptcy Code, and thus the Bankruptcy Court did not abuse its discretion in declining to stay the debtor's adversary proceeding pending contractual arbitration.

July 23, 2002

Case

Court

Holding

APS Sports Collectibles, Inc. v. Sports Time, Inc.
(DBN Subscription Required)
7th Cir. The UFTA does not create personal liability for nondebtor corporate officers and directors who participate in a fradulent transfer
In re Apex Oil Co.
(DBN Subscription Required)
8th Cir. A contingency fee lawyer's failure to maintain contemporaneous billing records warranted reduction of the fees sought by several hundred thousand dollars.

July 22, 2002

Case

Court

Holding

In re Bliemeister
(DBN Subscription Required)
9th Cir. Sovereign immunity is quasi-jurisdictional in nature. It may be forfeited where the State fails to assert it and therefore may be viewed as an affirmative defense.  Where a State made a tactical decision to delay asserting an immunity defense, the defense was waived. To allow a State to assert sovereign immunity after listening to a court's substantive comments on the merits of a case would give the state an unfair advantage when litigating suits.
 
Copyright © 2001  [BKINFORMATION.COM]. All rights reserved.