| 
         New Cases For the Week of April 15, 2002 - April
        19, 2002 
        Brought to you by BKINFORMATION.COM
        - The Source for Business Bankruptcy Information on the Internet  
        
        
    
    
      
 
      
 
      
  
    
       
        
          
            
              
                April
                  18, 2002 
                 | 
               
              
                | 
                   Case 
                 | 
                Court 
                 | 
                
                   Holding 
                 | 
               
            
           
         
        
          
            
              
                US
                  v. Craft 
                  (DBN Subscription Required) | 
                US Sup.
                  Ct. | 
                For
                  purposes of the federal tax lien statute, Congress intended
                  the statute to reach every property right a taxpayer might
                  have.  The absence of a taxpayer's right to unilaterally
                  alienate property without the consent of others is not
                  dispositive of whether the taxpayer has a lienable interest in
                  the property. The fact that State law does not allow creditors
                  to reach tenancy by the entireties property does not determine
                  whether the subject property is lienable for federal purposes. | 
               
              
                 | 
                 | 
                 | 
               
            
           
         
        
          
            
              
                April
                  16, 2002 
                 | 
               
              
                | 
                   Case 
                 | 
                Court 
                 | 
                
                   Holding 
                 | 
               
            
           
         
        
          
            
              
                In
                  re Sallee 
                  (DBN Subscription Required) | 
                6th Cir. | 
                Because
                  applicable State law provides that a duty to disclose can
                  arise from a partial disclosure of relevant information to a
                  counter party, the bankruptcy court did not err in finding
                  that a creditor bank (which disclosed one, but not all of the
                  appraisals on the collateral) defrauded the debtor borrowers,
                  even in the absence of a fiduciary relationship. 
                  Moreover, there was no error in the finding that prior
                  releases did not extinguish the fraud claims, as the bank
                  defrauded the debtors into signing the releases.  The
                  court did err though in its calculation of damages requiring
                  remand for recalculation of actual and punitive damages | 
               
              
                | In
                  re Armstrong | 
                8th
                  Cir.  | 
                The
                  bankruptcy court did not err in finding that a debtor's
                  prepetition cash transfers to a casino for gambling were made
                  with the actual intent to defraud creditors.  However,
                  the court did err in finding that the casino was protected
                  from fraudulent transfer liability by the the good faith safe
                  harbor of 11 USC 548(c), since the casino failed to adequately
                  investigate  the financial worthiness of the debtor. | 
               
              
                 | 
                 | 
                 | 
               
            
           
         
       | 
     
  | 
  
         |   
         |     |