New Cases For the Week of December 30, 2002 - January 3, 2003

Brought to you by BKINFORMATION.COM - The Source for Business Bankruptcy Information on the Internet 

 

January 3, 2002

Case

Court

Holding

In re Williams
(DBN Subscription Required)
9th Cir. BAP The bankruptcy court did not err in upholding a default judgment discharging a student loan when the debtor had served Sallie Mae's registered agent, and the registered agent's records reflected actual notice to Sallie Mae.
In re Garske
(DBN Subscription Required)
9th Cir. BAP Phone solicitation to a debtor after discharge by a secured creditor is not a per se violation of § 524(a)(2).
In re Thomas
(DBN Subscription Required)
9th Cir. BAP The determination of "good faith" belongs in the first instance to the bankruptcy court and that when the issue of § 363(m) "good faith" arises for the first time on appeal, it is appropriate to remand to the trial court for the limited purpose of affording it the opportunity to examine and rule upon the fact-intensive question

December 31, 2002

Case

Court

Holding

In re Sylmar Plaza, L.P.
(DBN Subscription Required)
9th Cir. The bankruptcy court did not err in finding that a plan was filed in good faith when the plan was filed by solvent debtors in order to cure and reinstate a defaulted note thereby avoiding payment of approximately $1,000,000 default interest.
In re Prescription Home Health Care, Inc.,
(DBN Subscription Required)
5th Cir. The bankruptcy court erred in approving as plan of reorganization that temporarily enjoined the IRS from assessing trust fund taxes against the debtor's president so long as the debtor timely made payment of such taxes under the plan.  Although the bankruptcy court has equitable authority under Energy Resources to require plan payments to be applied first to trust fund taxes, the court lacks jurisdiction to determine the tax liability of third parties, and the temporary injunction had the practical effect of such a determination. 

December 30, 2002

Case

Court

Holding

United States v. Wheeldon
(DBN Subscription Required)
8th Cir. Under the federal sentencing guidelines, one of the principal factors in determining a sentence is the "loss."  "Loss" means the greater of the actual loss or the intended loss.  In a bankruptcy fraud prosecution based upon concealment of assets (which were worth far less than the scheduled debt) in a case in which a discharge was not granted, the court erred in finding that the intended loss was the value of the debt which the debtor sought to discharge.  The correct figure for the intended loss was the value of the concealed assets.
Copyright © 2002  [BKINFORMATION.COM]. All rights reserved.