New Cases For the Week of January 15, 2001 - January 19, 2001

Brought to you by BKINFORMATION.COM - The Source for Business Bankruptcy Information on the Internet AND BKCLAIMS Marketplace - The Online Market For Bankruptcy Claims

Search This And Prior Case Summaries:

January 18, 2001

Case

Court

Holding

In re Cannon (DBN Subscription Required) 6th Cir. Although a provisional credit extended by a bank to a check kiter/ account holder creates an antecedent debt for preference purposes, the subsequent payment of such debt through the deposit of new funds is not an avoidable preference, since the bank has a statutory security interest in the kited checks (and proceeds), and the funds deposited to cover such checks are the proceeds of the checks, making the bank a fully secured creditor and immune from preference recovery.
In re Young (DBN Subscription Required) 10th Cir. An order converting a case from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 is not a final, appealable order. The requisite degree of appealable finality does not exist in a Chapter 13 case until confirmation of a plan.  Conversely, an order converting a case to Chapter 7 is appealable, since once the debtor's assets have been liquidated, it is virtually impossible to reassemble them.

The Court did not err in permitting the debtor to convert to Chapter 13 after obtaining a discharge in Chapter 7. Such "Chapter 20 conversions" are permitted, subject to the Court's review of the good faith of the conversion and the good faith of the Chapter 13 plan.

Although it was a "close question," the bankruptcy court did not err in confirming the 60-month Chapter 13 plan of a debtor who converted post-discharge from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 while a nondischargeability complaint by a prepetition wrongful discharge judgment creditor was pending.  The Chapter 13 plan represented the debtor's best efforts and committed all of projected his disposable income over the plan period. The court found that a qualifying Chapter 13 debtor "need not be turned away and forced to sell apples on the streets in every case in order to satisfy an impossibly large unsecured obligation, however egregious may have been the conduct which gave rise to the obligation."

January 17, 2001

Case

Court

Holding

In re Wedemeier
(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader to view)
8th Cir.  Even though the subject leases were rejected by operation of law, Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee was not estopped to avoid agricultural landlords' crop liens on crops grown on leased land.

However, the landlords were entitled to a claim for administrative rent on account of the estate's postpetition use of the land, and the bankruptcy court erred in calculating that rent merely by arithmetically apportioning the periods of prepetition and postpetition use. The estate's postpetition use, during the height of the growing season, extracted nearly all of the economic value available form the land.  

Katz v. CIR
(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader to view)
Tax Court Where a bankrupt partner's bankruptcy estate retains beneficial ownership of the partner's partnership interest as of the close of the partnership tax year, the partner's distributive share for the entire partnership taxable year is reportable by the bankruptcy estate.

January 16, 2001

Case

Court

Holding

In re Rubia
(Adobe Acrobat Reader required to view)

 

10th Cir. BAP When a lien perfected during the preference period is avoided, the lien is automatically preserved for the benefit of the estate.  However, this does not mean that the estate steps fully into the creditor's shoes and can take all actions the creditor could take to collect the debt associated with the lien.  The estate has only in rem rights against the collateral, the extent of which are determined by the amount of the creditor's claim on the petition date. 

The bankruptcy court did not err in denying turnover relief to a trustee who avoided a late-filed lien as a preference and sought to recover from the creditor as property of the estate the postpetition/pre-avoidance payments made by the debtor.  The payments, which were made form the postpetition personal service earnings of the Chapter 7 debtor, were not property of the estate and merely served to reduce the amount of the creditor's unsecured claim.

January 15, 2001

Case

Court

Holding

In re Lazar 9th Cir. The California State Water resources Control Board and Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Fund are arms of the State, entitled to 11th Amendment immunity.

When a State agency files a proof of claim in a bankruptcy case, it waives 11th Amendment immunity as to that claim and as to counterclaims arising out of the same event or occurence which form the basis for the claim.

 
Copyright © 2001  [BKINFORMATION.COM]. All rights reserved.