New Cases For the Week of
January 15, 2001 - January 19, 2001
Brought
to you by BKINFORMATION.COM - The Source
for Business Bankruptcy Information on the Internet AND BKCLAIMS
Marketplace - The Online Market For Bankruptcy Claims
January 18,
2001
|
Case
|
Court
|
Holding
|
In
re Cannon (DBN Subscription Required) |
6th Cir. |
Although
a provisional credit extended by a bank to a check kiter/ account holder
creates an antecedent debt for preference purposes, the subsequent
payment of such debt through the deposit of new funds is not an
avoidable preference, since the bank has a statutory security interest
in the kited checks (and proceeds), and the funds deposited to cover
such checks are the proceeds of the checks, making the bank a fully
secured creditor and immune from preference recovery. |
In
re Young (DBN Subscription Required) |
10th Cir. |
An
order converting a case from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 is not a final,
appealable order. The requisite degree of appealable finality does not
exist in a Chapter 13 case until confirmation of a plan.
Conversely, an order converting a case to Chapter 7 is appealable, since
once the debtor's assets have been liquidated, it is virtually
impossible to reassemble them.
The Court did not err in permitting the debtor to
convert to Chapter 13 after obtaining a discharge in Chapter 7. Such
"Chapter 20 conversions" are permitted, subject to the Court's
review of the good faith of the conversion and the good faith of the
Chapter 13 plan.
Although it was a "close question," the
bankruptcy court did not err in confirming the 60-month Chapter 13 plan
of a debtor who converted post-discharge from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13
while a nondischargeability complaint by a prepetition wrongful
discharge judgment creditor was pending. The Chapter 13 plan
represented the debtor's best efforts and committed all of projected his
disposable income over the plan period. The court found that a
qualifying Chapter 13 debtor "need not be turned away and forced to
sell apples on the streets in every case in order to satisfy an
impossibly large unsecured obligation, however egregious may have been
the conduct which gave rise to the obligation." |
|
|
|
January 17,
2001
|
Case
|
Court
|
Holding
|
In
re Wedemeier
(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader to view) |
8th Cir. |
Even
though the subject leases were rejected by operation of law, Chapter 7
bankruptcy trustee was not estopped to avoid agricultural landlords'
crop liens on crops grown on leased land.
However, the landlords were entitled to a claim for
administrative rent on account of the estate's postpetition use of the
land, and the bankruptcy court erred in calculating that rent merely by
arithmetically apportioning the periods of prepetition and postpetition
use. The estate's postpetition use, during the height of the growing
season, extracted nearly all of the economic value available form the
land. |
Katz
v. CIR
(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader to view) |
Tax Court |
Where
a bankrupt partner's bankruptcy estate retains beneficial ownership of
the partner's partnership interest as of the close of the partnership
tax year, the partner's distributive share for the entire partnership
taxable year is reportable by the bankruptcy estate. |
|
|
|
January 16,
2001
|
Case
|
Court
|
Holding
|
In re Rubia
(Adobe Acrobat Reader required to view) |
10th Cir. BAP |
When a lien
perfected during the preference period is avoided, the lien is
automatically preserved for the benefit of the estate. However,
this does not mean that the estate steps fully into the creditor's shoes
and can take all actions the creditor could take to collect the debt
associated with the lien. The estate has only in rem rights
against the collateral, the extent of which are determined by the amount
of the creditor's claim on the petition date.
The bankruptcy court did not err in denying turnover relief to a
trustee who avoided a late-filed lien as a preference and sought to
recover from the creditor as property of the estate the
postpetition/pre-avoidance payments made by the debtor. The
payments, which were made form the postpetition personal service
earnings of the Chapter 7 debtor, were not property of the estate and
merely served to reduce the amount of the creditor's unsecured claim. |
|
|
|
January 15,
2001
|
Case
|
Court
|
Holding
|
In re Lazar |
9th Cir. |
The
California State Water resources Control Board and Underground Storage
Tank Cleanup Fund are arms of the State, entitled to 11th Amendment
immunity.
When a State agency files a proof of claim in a
bankruptcy case, it waives 11th Amendment immunity as to that claim and
as to counterclaims arising out of the same event or occurence which
form the basis for the claim. |
|
|
|
|